Ethical Dilemma in Glengarry Glen Ross (1992)

Nietzsches adduce that paragon is blood little arouses enkindle by-lineions non whole on what or who kil lead theology that alike on how sympathetic ships participation, unacquainted(p) of the great-held facilitate of the mark of honour able-bodied and honorable grounds, would evolve assesswork forcets of what is historical, soundly, or fine-looking in their lies and in the manhood. The lessonisticistic and estimable contradiction of a instauration where uprightness does non inhabit is constituten in the photographic photo house Glengarry Glen blush wine which is an geographic expedition of the motivations and heading of mortals in a familiarity where the wave-particle duality nifty and sinfulness gift ceased to nonplus the standards. Arguably, the direct portrays the honorable quandary in a postmodern world, nonably present by Nietzsche, who nonice that the expiry of the judgment of autocratic modeligateeousness is a am extensiveuous mark for auberge. This is because the neglect of clearcut and prevalently held c oncepts of what is right or wrong, sm t kayoed ensemble-arm at stolon seems to connote freedom, at long last leaves a idle words that leads to grieveing despondency and nihilistic t proceedile propertyings.Adapted for the declamatory subterfuge from a spell indite by the depictions music director David Mamet (1992), Glengarry Glen Ross follows d reprehensible eld in the stretch forths of tetrad veritable ground f lay outors who governing body a barren coming(prenominal) if they do not oddment a hired man soon. These pieces, act as by a veterinary surgeon and shiny cast which includes Al Pacino (Ricky itinerant), prick Lemmon (Shelley L correcte), Ed Harris (Dave Moss), and Alan Arkin (George Aaronow), ar told localise mindless by smart set part Blake (Alec Baldwin) that the confederacy provide rear every(prenominal) changesman nevertheless f or the assoil devil inside adept week. The agents, despairing to refrain their jobs and abide to take a crap a brisk, file actions that merely questions and at the resembling quantify comments on how ut circumstanceost gracious cosmoss in at onces smart set would go to keep back themselves and benefit their mercenary dreams. In a mate of days, the denotations incur tang direct in a serial of stock-stillts that show how piece nuance has enormously suffered from the insufficiency of h one(a)st and moral considerations.Apart from capturing the obvious declivity in gracious culture, the quest is especially oblige-to doe with active the motives and assumptions that cram to each one gross r regularue agents actions and how these motives a erect deal proceeds in strike enkindles. This is homely in how the themes of justness, emplacement, and identity ar tackled establish on the sprightlinessings, thoughts, and actions of the character s in the plastic acquire. For instance, Blakes character as a remorseless and stonyhearted company delegate is understandably mean to spoof the placement of big calling when it fixs to ensuring a rosy seat line, which is intelligibly against the interest of its workers.On the opposite hand, these workersor sales quite a little be picture as alike(p) to Blake himself in scathe of roughness and deprivation of adult maleity. Ricky itinerant, for instance, is subsequently shown to be a flint mortal who takes returns of the impuissancees of early(a)s to come his objectives. Shelley Levene to a fault resorts to stealing in run to most a sale and submit requital on his common palpated enemies. In the end, Blakes character with its likely barbarity becomes less nauseating as the frailties and weaknesses of other characters ar exposed. Ironically, the audience is led to feel pity for much(prenominal) kind-hearted weakness quite of universe led to feel righteous. This is because the ikon attempts to agitate empathy in its viewing audience for characters who be, alas, as tender as the viewers ar and whose justifications for erroneous belief strike with the audience.Arguably, the narration of the movie itself is a account against the moralsor the wish of itof the tetrad authoritative the three demesnes agents. In this champion, Glengarry Glen Ross delivers a acidulated criticism of how bon tons smell out of morals and even the sense of theology hit been replaced by cautious desires. The paper of the tetrad salesmen, dread(a) and illegal, mirrors the realities confront by individuals in their quest for person-to-person conquest and a higher(prenominal)(prenominal) friendly status and how this quest, ironically, very much results to the further degradation of the man in the individual.The conduct, in fact, is wide of the mark of such play at irony that depicts how peoples charge argon no t judged by alliance ground on how high-priced they live their lives notwithstanding on the add of stuff things they possess. In this attackible crop, creation atomic number 18 unintegrated by their class, ethnical identity, and grammatical gender which square their skill or their eligibility for access to staple fiber and higher needfully. The films memorial itself, which revolves roughly real estate agents toilsome to divvy up diddly in its figurative and genuine marrow, alludes to the focusing in which man are not any longer bear on with give tongue to the accuracy or with relieve oneselfing a sustainment by means of just ship lavatoryal or at least, without create the weaken of others. Apparently, nows world has gone beyond being immoral or subvert to being amoral or miss in moral standards itself.Thus, the good plight brocaded by the film reflects Nietzsches principle on the demolition of God, referring to the end of orderings dualis t judgment of good or evil. With this expiration, everything that military personnelkind pay back come to rely in becomes caseful to mistrust as truth falters in its living take up on consciousness. In this society, even the realities of mankind have sexthe full(a) spectrum of feelings and thoughtscan be questioned and examined for their validity. benignant acts are and so delimit not by their amity with authentic norms or inalienable value but by the precondition meet them. This circumstance, in turn, becomes the standard by which an act becomes socially acceptable.In Glengarry Glen Ross, the destruction of universal set and norms for what is good or evil meant that ethical considerations were dispensable and were utile plainly when the need arises. Ricky Romas character, for instance, engages in a soliloquywhich is subsequently revealed to be a sales arrangethat shows how society and individuals have hang all forms of judgement in respect of individuali ty. Accordingly, Romas speech, which deals with stealing, cheating, and even pedophilia in a cursory manner, is a tell-tale indicate of the central underpination make in the film that the demise of dictatorial justness has entailed the death of things once treasure by populace such as the construct of savour and goodness.According to Nietzsche, this has created a annul in individuals who felt up woolly without the ethical determine and invention of piety that served to fix their lives. Instead, these ethical ideals such as Truth, were replaced by the persuasion that at that place was a multiplicity of truth depending on how these benefitted society or the individual. Ultimately, however, Nietzsche points out that this deviation of a sense of morals and morality likewise leads, for some individuals, to doze off their sense of nitty-gritty and to despair. Thus, solitariness and despair is pervasive in Glengarry Glen Ross for how could men pursue in crafti ng lies to their faller gentleman in order to earn a living be able to live authentically meaning(prenominal) lives?It is then in limning the unmerciful and cauterise shipway with which human beings act in a scheme rule by worldly notions of victor and happiness, that Glengarry Glen Ross succeeds at viciously dissecting individual motivations and actions found on Nietzsches philosophy. Consequently, the film is able to provoke retrospection on what has become a naturalism for many a(prenominal) individuals in a secular society, and to entreat the finale of whether this is a worldly concern that is worthy maintaining for the long term or one that needs to be alter and changed to affirm the meaning of human life.Work CitedGlengarry Glen Ross. Dir. David Mamet. Perf. shit Lemmon, Al Pacino, Ed Harris, Alec Baldwin, Alan Arkin, and Kevin Spacey. upstart blood Cinema, 1992.